In November 2010 Arizona voters won by a narrow margin for legalizing medical marijuana. Since then Arizona policymakers with assistance of the pain society wrote the statutes for use of marijuana. In Article 2 , R9-17-201 a patient must have one of the following debilitating conditions diagnosed by a physician to qualify for registration to obtain a medical marijuana card.
1. Cancer
2. HIV
3. Glaucoma
4. AIDS
5. Hepatitis C
6. ALS
7. Crohns disease
8. Alzheimers disease with agitation
9. Cachexia or wasting syndrome from a chronic medical disease
10.Chronic pain from a disease
11. Chronic nausea from a disease
12. Seizures from a chronic disease including those in the form of Epilepsy
13. Severe persistent muscle spasms from a chronic disease characteristic of MS.
14. Lastly, an added disease that is debilitating in ADL's with substantiation that medical marijuana will be of palliative benefit through description of the disease and patient afflictions along with peer reviewed articles for benefit.
The above patient physician relationship must be fully documented with history, physical exam, diagnosis and the reason for medical marijuana in palliative care. At any time, a physician can request a card holder to be revoked from their medical marijuana card based on evidence of diversion, no benefit, and noncompliance.
The irony in medical marijuana; it is still against federal law. Secondly, there are no scientific evidence based medicine guidelines for efficacy in treatment of pain with dosing, effects of marijuana on the pain receptors and benefit vs harm. Therefore, the DEA classifies medical marijuana as a Controlled substance Class I and an illegal substance for medical use based on no scientific evidence. The Federal Prosecutor issued a warning to Arizona State Health Department on May 3,2011 stating cultivators, patients, and caregivers are breaking federal law. http://the420times.com/2011/05/arizona-federal-prosecutor-warns-state-about-medical-marijuana/. In Rhode Island, Maine, Colorado, and California there are documented reports of cultivators and patients prosecuted along with physicians in some states.
The AMA still firmly stands against endorsement for medical marijuana and state regulated marijuana programs. In November 2009, the AMA called for the federal government to ease the restrictions with marijuana for more scientific research. http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-5614233-503544.html However, the AMA stands firm in not endorsing it.
The Arizona Pain Society has not endorsed medical marijuana and the Arizona Medical Board policy for Pain Management as endorsed by American Pain Society and the American Academy of Pain Medicine has not endorsed medical marijuana.
How does all the controversy with the boards and laws exist amongst practicing physicians in Arizona. It is easy either they prescribe or they don't. Most of the ones I talked with at the Arizona Pain Society/ Medical Marijuana Conference were against medical marijuana. It is a harm rather than benefit to the public and a drug that can easily be diverted. It will be hard for patients to find a physician in Arizona to prescribe it. Physicians and nurse practitioners adhere to the guidelines with Board of Medicine and the Board of Nursing in prescribing opioids. Those patients who do receive their medical marijuana cards will be reinforced to stay with their physician for pain management due to medical liability with marijuana detection in their urine.
The Medical Marijuana Program is new to Arizona and only passed by a margin of the voters. Most medical professionals and societies for pain management are against it due to the lack of scientific evidence. There isn't a reason to give a patient an addictive substance when pain medications can be manipulated for better pain control. Over the next few years we will watch how the Board of Medicine, and the Arizona Pain Society deals with this issue. I doubt anything will change in policies and guidelines. It is a hard drug to do research for evidenced based medicine.
Notice: This site is copyrighted and that means all articles written are not to be duplicated or copied. It is an infringement of copyrights and punishable by law.